Darkness At Noon Essays

The Conflict Between the Individual and the State and the Grammatical Fiction in Darkness At Noon

“The Party denied the free will of an individual-and at the same time exacted his willing self-sacrifice.” The obvious contradiction of the above definition of the Communist party is depicts the conflict between the individual and the State in Arthur Koestler’s novel Darkness at Noon. Koestler’s protagonist Nicolas Salamanovich Rubashov, devout communist and former leader of the Communist party, falls victim to his own system during the time of the Moscow trials. Accused and imprisoned for crimes he did not commit, Rubashov is forced to choose between the ideology he has faithfully followed for the past forty years of his life, or a new found sense of self, which he calls the “grammatical fiction”.

During the beginning of Rubashov’s solitary incarceration, he begins to doubt the infallibility of the Communist regime, and for a time, views himself independent from the Party. Rubashov’s pulling away from Communism is evident in his conversation with the examining magistrate, Ivanov, during his first hearing. Rubashov addresses Ivanov’s collective viewpoint with the developing views of his own:

“Your argument is somewhat anachronistic,” said Rubashov. “As you quite rightly remarked, we were accustomed always to use the plural ‘we’ and to avoid as far as possible the first person singular. I have rather lost the habit of this form of speech; you stick to it. But who is this ‘we’ in whose name you speak to-day? It needs re-defining. That is the point.”

Apart from the Party, Rubashov no longer functions as part of the Communist unit, but rather as an individual. Within communist doctrine the individual is only a piece of a larger system, and for the true communist the pronoun ‘I’ is not even part of his or her vocabulary. Rather, the personal ‘I’ is replaced by ‘we’, which represents the Party. The significance of Rubashov’s statement is that even his speech patterns, a physical manifestation of one’s subconscious, display his self-detachment from the Communist Party in that he has lost his ability to associate with the communist We.

Over and over Rubashov is tormented by the idea “I shall pay”, an unrest due to his uncertainty about the foundation of Communism he has placed himself on. Shortly after his first hearing he writes in his diary “The fact is: I no longer believe in my infallibility. That is why I am lost.” It is evident that he is beginning to take personal responsibility for the actions he has committed on behalf of the Party, the people that he has betrayed and the seemingly absurd doctrines he has readily submitted to. Both Rubashov’s mental disquiet, and his observable, critical actions are owed to his new found recognition of himself as an individual, a loophole in Communist doctrine.

All his life Rubashov had “burnt the remains of the old illogical morality from his consciousness”, and was unaware that ideas outside of those expressed by the Party had any logical basis. He once thought that any other view was irrational and false. In his cell waiting to be taken to his execution, Rubashov reflects on his former devotion to the Party:

For in a struggle one must have both legs firmly planted on the earth. The Party had taught one how to do it. The infinite was a politically suspect quantity, and the “I” a suspect quality. The Party did not recognize its existence. The definition of an individual was a multitude of one million divided by one million.

As a Communist he had sacrificed his individuality for the benefit of the Party, and forty years later he had lost the capability to even think outside the lines of the Party’s dogmas. He had denied the individual within himself, which is why he is confused at the emergence of his “silent partner”, the free-thinking individual within himself. His conscious self had been founded in the ‘we’, until he was imprisoned. Facing death, Rubashov realizes the destructiveness of a political system that doesn’t account for the individual.

No longer confused by his apathy for the Party, Rubashov’s final hours are marked by a fatalistic mindset and an internal sense of peace. In Rubashov’s conversation with Ivanov during Rubashov’s second hearing, Ivanov states: “The greatest temptaion for the like of us is: to renounce violence, to repent, to make peace with oneself”. Ivanov represents rubashov’s former viewpoint. However, no longer subject to the repressive Communist order, Rubashov does find reconciliation with himself:

He was a man who had lost his shadow, released from every bond. He followed every thought to its last conclusion and acted in accordance with it to the very end. The hours which remained to him belonged to the silent partner, whose realm started just where logical thought ended. He had christened it the ‘grammatical fiction’ with that shamefacedness about the first person singular which the Party had inculcated in its disciples.

At this point Rubashov rests. The inner turmoil he had from being torn between two avenues of thought had ceased. He has realized the futility of the Party’s actions, and in his own way repented of those actions by dissociating himself from the Party. Although the Party had essentially banished Rubashov first, Rubashov’s conflict had resulted from his mental loyalty for the System to which he fell victim. Having lost his faith in Communism, Rubashov devotes the remaining part of his life to the “grammatical fiction”, and finds contentment. Rubashov is no longer afraid of death because death is imminent, and not even the most logical thought or powerful dictator can alter the natural law of death. After enduring emotional and mental torment, he realizes he has “earned the right to sleep” and die peacefully.

Rubashov’s experiences in prison altered his view of the communist system and upturned the faith he had for it. The idea that a doctrine in which the individual is not accounted for becomes an absurdity. The appearance of the grammatical fiction in Rubashov’s case, is representative of the larger conflict between the individual and the State. Rubashov’s experience is a microcosm of the people who suppressed their own individual thought and reason for that of the Party and Stalinist dictatorship. The idea expressed by Koestler in Darkness at Noon is that the Communist system’s ultimate failure lies within its idea that the individual is a “sacrificial lamb” for the Party. Instead, it is the individual that is the essential factor in making a society. An individual can survive without a government, but a government can not survive without the support of the individual, and it is for this reason that no form of Communism has ever reached the utopian peak in which Marx and Engles expressed in The Manifesto of the Communist Party.

Filed Under: Literature

Darkness at noon essay topics

Rated 4/5 based on 42 review

Darkness at noon essay topics

Essay instructions: second written assignment topic on darkness at noon write an essay of two double-spaced typed pages (one inch margins, any 12 pitch font) based on. Paper topic: darkness at noon by arthur koestler is a disturbing account of nicholas rubashov, a devout communist party member, who faces charges in the moscow show. Sample analysis essay on 'darkness at noon' written by harold krents free example term paper touching upon an important issue in our society. The saving grace of rubashov despite its brevity darkness at noon by arthur koestler packs an enormous amount of thought provoking dialog and insight into what may go. Darkness at noon paper topic: darkness at noon by arthur koestler is a disturbing account of nicholas rubashov, a devout communist party member, who faces charges in.

Essays and criticism on arthur koestler's darkness at noon - critical essays. Darkness at noon stands darkness at preview ethical analysis of high noon 4 pages (1000 words) new essays tags the newest essay topics. Darkness at noon harold krents essays — critical analysis free handicapped papers, essays, and research papers these results are sorted by most relevant first. Darkness at noon harold krents essays - critical analysis of darkness at noon by harold krents.

In “darkness at noon”, harold krents vividly describes some of the everyday prejudices disabled citizens must face presented in an often humorous fashion, the. Structured observation essay topics recall gray davisrelationship essay conclusion research paper topics introduction darkness at noon is a novel written by arthur.

Searching for darkness at noon irony essays find free darkness at noon irony essays, term papers, research papers, book reports, essay topics, college essays. Darkness at noon lesson plans include daily lessons, fun activities, essay topics, test/quiz questions, and more everything you need to teach darkness at noon. Darkness at noon by arthur koestler was written about a character named rubashov rubashov was an old guard for the bolsheviks and was involved in the 1917 revolution.

Free darkness at noon papers, essays, and research papers. Download thesis statement on darkness at noon in our database or order an original thesis paper that will be written by one of our staff writers and delivered. Introduction “darkness at noon” is a novel written by arthur koestler, a british novelist the book was originally published in 1940 koestler provides a story of.

Guilty betrayal in arthur koestler's darkness at noon on studybaycom - darkness at noon is a novel by arthur koestler, online marketplace for students.

Darkness at noon essays rubashov, himself an aging bolshevik revolutionary and one of the few survivors from lenin. Upon reading arthur koestler's darkness at noon and studying save time and order ”darkness at noon” by arthur koestler essay search for the related topics. Darkness at noon essay 2101 words | 9 pages so in actuality, the moment rubashov chose to allow his conscience to dictate his beliefs—instead of no1—was the.

Talk:darkness at noon why not start a new section dealing with literary criticism of darkness at noon orwell's essay is if they wrote on similar topics. Darkness at noon essays darkness at noon is a fictional novel written by arthur koestler that stands as a portrayal of the nightmare politics during the twentieth. Free essays on darkness at noon by harold krents for students use our papers to help you with yours 1 - 30. Darkness at noon r$ darkness at noon essay looking for essay samples online or the essay did not fit your needs you can order an essay on any topic. 1 trace the references to light—both natural and artificial—and dark in the novel, and the relationship of this motif to rubashov’s ability to make sense of.

One thought on “Darkness At Noon Essays

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *