Gun Control Should Be Banned Essay

  • Guns are dangerous to our society

    Sandy Hook School has had a terrible incident that included more than 20 children being killed by a gun. If guns were banned, this horrible event would never have taken place. Guns have also caused great problems to us. Many people have attempted to kill themselves with guns. Without guns the people wouldn't have killed themselves so easily.

  • Guns should be banned

    I don't understand why people can't realize that GUNS ARE BAD! When arguing with a 2nd Amendment, gun-toting redneck nut, you will most probably come across simple minded arguments like :Guns don't kill people, people kill people. And: Criminals won't follow gun laws. First of all, what is the main purpose of a gun? Quite simply, to kill. A gun has no constructive uses. When a person becomes a psychopath, most likely the first weapon they will turn to is a gun. Not a knife, not a can of pepper spray, but an assault rifle. Secondly, it may be true that criminals don't follow gun laws. Do they follow murder and rape laws either? No. So does that mean that the government should take away murder and rape laws because some people disobey them? If stricter gun laws are put into place, a criminal will think twice about using one. And just like a murderer or a rapist has to face the harsh American court system, so will a shooter. I personally feel that we have had enough of gun violence. Newtown, Aurora, and Arizona are just a few examples. The only way to stop gun violence is to get rid of the guns, not add more to the mix. People are very adverse to giving up their gun rights because the 2nd Amendment acts as a security blanket for them and makes them feel that if they have assault rifles and pistols, then they can protect themselves from any calamity that may befall them. Wake up, people.

  • Suicide is outrageous.

    Teens especially are going around killing themselves with guns. I've lost 3 friends who've lost their lives due to guns. My feelings are saying that I don't want my kids going around killing their self. No one wants to lose a friend or a child. Yes, Guns should be banned from the United States of America.

  • Children are affected by it.

    Guns are an unfortunate and dangerous reality in the lives of our children. Too many children in the United States are affected by gun violence in the form of death, non-fatal gun injuries, or the emotional after effects. Over one-third of all homes contain guns, and despite continuing educational efforts, the majority of these guns are kept loaded, unlocked and potentially accessible to children. Research indicates that if a gun is stored in a home, the risk of homicide increases threefold and the risk of suicide increases fivefold. Guns also are 43 times as likely to be used to kill a family member or someone known to a family than to kill a stranger. Children have easy access to guns. Over 5% of high school students indicated that they carried a gun in the past month, and it is estimated that approximately one million children bring guns to school each year. Many students who carry guns do so because they are afraid or influenced by peer pressure. What will it take for us to stop this senseless loss of young lives? Common sense gun laws can make the difference but the responsibility to keep the children safe doesn’t end here. Individuals and families must remove guns from their homes so their children can be safe!

  • Yes, we aren't living in the middle ages anymore

    We are now in the 21st century. There is no longer the need to protect ourselves using a gun, and the only reason why you might need a gun is because someone else has got a gun, which is just an endless cycle. Arguing that you need a gun to protect yourself is like saying I need drugs to protect myself from drugs -- but the world doesn't work like that -- problems aren't sorted out with the problem, they are sorted out with a solution. I don't know what the solution is, but I do know that guns definitely aren't the answer.

  • Gun owners are no better than drug addicts.

    Gun owners are EXACTLY what a drug addict or an alcoholic is. They don't believe that their activities harm other people, so they continue to selfishly indulge. Just like drug addicts claim that they have the right to abuse drugs because it's "their body", gun owners claim that they have the right to own weapons of war because some dead slave owners said they did on an outdated document.

    Anyone who defends gun ownership is the same person who would defend a deadly drug habit.

    The 2nd amendment should be completely repealed, guns should be confiscated nationwide, and the possession of guns or ammunition should be made a felony.

  • Guns should be banned to the public

    Allowing guns to be open to the public is generally a bad idea. IF guns were not so easy to obtain then there would be a great decrease in shootings. Guns should only be available to military personnel or police officers and such. Because anyone with bad intentions could easily just go to a shop, buy a gun, then go and shoot someone. If someone attempted mass slaughter with a knife people would stand more of a chance, and the killer could even be stopped with skilled hand on hand combat. There is a huge difference. And it would be easier to stop someone if the police officers were the only one with guns.

  • Guns are dangerous and should be banned

    It's time for a complete repeal of the 2nd amendment. It will be a long and arduous process to ultimately eliminate guns from society, but it's definitely time to place a 100% ban on the sale of all types of firearms and ammunition. Once the sale of guns and ammunition has been banned, illegal firearms will still circulate, but their numbers should gradually diminish. If the total number of deaths from guns in the US each year were, for example, less than 100, then the repeal of the 2nd amendment would not be necessary. As it stands right now, however, the damage already caused and the near certainty of further damage to come warrants a complete ban. The only viable alternative to a complete ban is a limitation that only small caliber single shot hunting rifles be sold.

  • There should at least be gun control.

    There should at least be gun control in the US. Compare Canada's and America's death rates. Canada's death rate is significantly lower. We can't access guns as easily. But in America, getting a gun is like taking candy from a baby. A lawful owner might turn into a psychopath and go on a massacre. You never know what's going to happen with a gun.

  • You don't want anyone to be killed.

    Guns should be banned because if teachers had guns and they were really angry, they would shoot the children and that is not nice. If you have a gun do not ever threaten someone with it. You do not want anyone to be killed with a gun, so I say yes guns should be banned.

  • Gun control is a hot button issue, especially in the wake of so many recent, tragic mass shootings. It is also a polarizing issue, which means that it tends to divide people.

    When you’re writing an argumentative essay, it generally doesn’t matter what side of an issue you take. What matters is that you take a side and support whichever position you choose.

    In the case of the gun control issue, you could plausibly—and defensibly—take either side: strict regulation up to and including an outright ban on firearms or complete legalization of individual gun ownership.

    Either way, you’re going to need strong evidence.

    With this in mind, I’ve sourced 12 gun control articles from online publications that illustrate both sides of the debate, plus two articles that can help you understand the background of the issue.

    For each article, I’ve included the author’s basic point and why the article is a worthwhile resource, as well as citations for APA and MLA 7th and MLA 8th editions.

    No matter what side you argue, this post will point you to some credible sources for your argumentative gun control essay.

    6 Supporting Gun Control Articles

    Pro-gun control article #1: Gun Control and the Constitution: Should We Amend the Second Amendment?

    This article discusses what is perhaps the greatest source of contention in the entire debate: the Second Amendment’s wording.

    The author quotes former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who advocates changing the Second Amendment’s confusing language to clarify that it only applies to those serving in a militia.

    Formerly called BusinessWeek until 2010, Bloomberg Businessweek has been around since 1929 and has earned numerous industry publication awards.

    APA Citation

    Barrett, P. M. (2014, February 10). Gun control and the Constitution: Should we amend the Second Amendment? Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-02-20/gun-control-and-the-constitution-should-we-amend-the-second-amendment

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    Barrett, Paul M. “Gun Control and the Constitution: Should We Amend the Second Amendment?” Bloomberg Businessweek. Bloomberg, 20 Feb. 2014. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    Barrett, Paul M. “Gun Control and the Constitution: Should We Amend the Second Amendment?” Bloomberg Businessweek, 20 Feb. 2014, www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-02-20/gun-control-and-the-constitution-should-we-amend-the-second-amendment. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    A quick note about citations. I’ve included both MLA 7th edition and MLA 8th edition, as well as APA, citations for each article that you can use if you decide to reference the source in your gun control essay.

    Because the MLA 8th edition went into effect in early 2016, not all professors/schools will require the use of the new format. Check with your professor to see which edition he or she prefers.

    The 8th edition of MLA also suggests that you include the URL in each entry. Including the date you accessed an online source is now optional. I’ve included both pieces of information in my examples.

    (Again, check with your professor to see what he or she prefers.)

    Pro-gun control article #2: It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.

    Bovy tackles the gun issue by arguing that the debate should not be about closing loopholes in gun control. She doesn’t argue that specific types of guns should be banned, but argues that all guns should be banned.

    This article is published by New Republic, which “…was founded in 1914 as a journal of opinion which seeks to meet the challenge of a new time” (NewRepublic.com). “Today, the New Republic is the voice of creative thinkers, united by a collective desire to challenge the status quo” (NewRepublic.com).

    APA Citation

    Bovey, P. M. (2015, December 10). It’s time to ban guns. Yes, all of them. New Republic. Retrieved from http://www.newrepublic.com/article/125498/its-time-ban-guns-yes-them

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    Bovey, Phoebe, M. “It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.” New Republic. New Republic, 10 Dec. 2015. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    Bovey, Phoebe, M. “It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.” New Republic, 10 Dec. 2015, newrepublic.com/article/125498/its-time-ban-guns-yes-them. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    Pro-gun control article #3: Battleground America

    This well-researched article was written in the aftermath of the Trayvon Martin shooting. It covers three main areas:

    • An in-depth discussion of the meaning of existing gun laws and the Second Amendment.
    • The difference between now and the time in which the Amendment was drafted.
    • How the drastically increased killing power of modern firearms makes any reference to the laws crafted two centuries ago obsolete.

    LePore is a frequent contributor to TheNew Yorker, as well as many other national news magazines.

    APA Citation

    LePore, J. (2012, April 23). Battleground America. The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/04/23/battleground-america

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    LePore, Jill. “Battleground America.” The New Yorker. The New Yorker, 23 Apr. 2012. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    LePore, Jill. “Battleground America.” The New Yorker, 23 Apr. 2012, www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/04/23/battleground-america. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    Pro-gun control article #4: Why We Can’t Talk About Gun Control

    Hamblin discusses one of the most problematic aspects of the gun control debate: the fact that it is so politicized.

    Here, the author explains his opinion by framing it in his own experiences. He states that he lost his job when he published a column arguing that it’s possible to regulate guns without infringing on individuals’ rights.

    Hamblin is a frequent contributor and senior editor at TheAtlantic.

    APA Citation

    Hamblin, J. (2014, June 29). Why we can’t talk about gun control. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive /2014/06/how-to-interpret-the-second-amendment/373664

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    Hamblin, James. “Why We Can’t Talk About Gun Control.” The Atlantic. The Atlantic Monthly Group, 29 June 2014. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    Hamblin, James. “Why We Can’t Talk About Gun Control.” The Atlantic, The Atlantic Monthly Group, 29 June 2014, www.theatlantic.com/politics /archive/2014/06/how-to-interpret-the-second-amendment/373664. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    Pro-gun control article #5: California’s proposed gun laws won’t change our culture of violence, but they will make us safer

    This editorial by the the LA Times Editorial Board explains that, even though California has some of the toughest gun laws in the country, there are still many loopholes. The editorial board argues that stricter regulations for purchasing guns and ammunition need to be in place to stop gun violence.

    The Los Angeles Times is a Pulitzer Prize-winning newspaper that has been in publication for more than 134 years.

    APA Citation

    Times Editorial Board. (2016, April 22). California’s proposed gun laws won’t change our culture of violence, but they will make us safer. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-adv-california-guns-20160422-story

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    Times Editorial Board. “California’s Proposed Gun Laws Won’t Change Our Culture of Violence, but They Will Make Us Safer.” LATimes.comLos Angeles Times Media Group, 22 Apr. 2016. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    Times Editorial Board. “California’s Proposed Gun Laws Won’t Change Our Culture of Violence, but They Will Make Us Safer.” Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles Times Media Group, 22 Apr. 2016, www.latimes.com/opinion/ editorials/la-ed-adv-california-guns-20160422-story. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    Pro-gun control article #6: 4 Pro-Gun Arguments We’re Sick of Hearing

    Though you might not automatically think hard-hitting news when you think of Rolling Stone magazine, the author of this brief article succinctly sums up four common pro-gun arguments and explains why she doesn’t feel they’re effective.

    Rolling Stone covers a variety of cultural, music, social, and political news and is a well-established magazine.

    APA Citation

    Marcotte, A. (2015, October 1). 4 pro-gun arguments we’re sick of hearing. Rolling Stone. Retrieved from http://www.rollingstone.com/ politics/news/4-pro-gun-arguments-were-sick-of-hearing-20151001

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    Marcotte, Amanda. “4 Pro-Gun Arguments We’re Sick of Hearing.” Rolling Stone. Rolling Stone, 1 Oct. 2015. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    Marcotte, Amanda. “4 Pro-Gun Arguments We’re Sick of Hearing.” Rolling Stone, 1 Oct. 2015, www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/4-pro-gun-arguments-were-sick-of-hearing-20151001. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    Now that we’ve examined articles in favor of gun control, let’s take a look at a few articles that are against gun control.

    6 Opposing Gun Control Articles

    Anti-gun control article #1: 5 arguments against gun control — and why they are all wrong

    Published in the LA Times, this op-ed piece is written by Evan DeFilippis and Devin Hughes, who are the founders of the gun violence prevention site Armed With Reason.

    The authors argue that gun control laws don’t deter criminals and cannot prevent mass shootings.

    APA Citation

    DeFillipis, E., & Hughes, D. (2016). 5 arguments against gun control—and why they are all wrong. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/ opinion/op-ed/la-oe-defilippis-hughes-gun-myths-debunked-20160708-snap-story

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    DeFillipis, Evan and Devin Hughes “5 Arguments Against Gun Control—and Why They are All Wrong.” LATimes.com. Los Angeles Times, 8 July 2016. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    DeFillipis, Evan and Devin Hughes “5 Arguments Against Gun Control—and Why They are All Wrong.” Los Angeles Times, 8 July 2016, www.latimes.com/ opinion/op-ed/la-oe-defilippis-hughes-gun-myths-debunked-20160708-snap-story. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    Anti-gun control article #2: Gun control isn’t the answer

    Wilson, an author of several books about crime and a teaching fellow at Pepperdine University, asks an interesting question: how could or would we ever get rid of the hundreds of millions of guns that already exist in the United States?

    He takes the stance that banning firearms is pointless, that “the genie is out of the bottle.” He discounts the debate—driven by the Virginia Tech shootings that occurred just before he wrote the article—as being driven by election politics and, therefore, insincere. Though this source is a bit older, it still raises a valid question.

    APA Citation

    Wilson, J. Q. (2007, April 20). Gun control isn’t the answer. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved fromhttp://www.latimes.com/la-oe-wilson20apr20-story.html

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    Wilson, James Q. “Gun Control Isn’t the Answer.” LATimes.com. Los Angeles Times, 20 Apr. 2007. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    Wilson, James Q. “Gun Control Isn’t the Answer.” Los Angeles Times, 20 Apr. 2007, www.latimes.com/la-oe-wilson20apr20-story.html. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    Anti-gun control article #3: Why Gun Owners are Right to Fight Against Gun Control

    Hardy argues that sweeping gun control legislation proposed by the anti-gun lobby leaves no room for compromise. He then does a U-turn and complains about the slippery-slope nature of bans on one kind of weapon, such as assault weapons or sniper rifles, leading slowly but surely to total prohibition.

    Hardy fears that the gun control lobby is on a crusade to wipe out individual gun ownership altogether.

    Hardy is an Arizona attorney and a Second Amendment scholar and writer.

    APA Citation

    Hardy, D. T. (2013, July 18). Why gun owners are right to fight against gun control. Reason.com. Retrieved from http://www.reason.com/archives/ 2013/07/18/why-second-amendment-supporters-are-righ

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    Hardy, David T. “Why Gun Owners are Right to Fight Against Gun Control.” Reason.com. Reason Foundation, 18 July 2013. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    Hardy, David T. “Why Gun Owners are Right to Fight Against Gun Control.” Reason.com, Reason Foundation, 18 July 2013, reason.com/ archives/2013/07/18/why-second-amendment-supporters-are-righ. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    Anti-gun control article #4: ‘American Sniper’ widow: Gun control won’t protect us

    This opinion piece discusses one woman’s experience with gun violence and why she believes gun control is not the answer.

    Taya Kyle, the writer of this article, is also the author of American Wife: A Memoir of Love, War, Faith, and Renewal. The movie American Sniper was based on her late husband, Chris Kyle.

    APA Citation

    Kyle, T. (2013, July 18). ‘American Sniper’ widow: Gun control won’t protect us. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/07/opinions/taya-kyle-gun-control

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    Kyle, Taya. “‘American Sniper’ Widow: Gun Control Won’t Protect Us.” CNN.com. Cable News Network, 18 July 2013. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    Kyle, Taya. “‘American Sniper’ Widow: Gun Control Won’t Protect Us.” CNN, 18 July 2013, www.cnn.com/2016/01/07/opinions/taya-kyle-gun-control. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    Anti-gun control article #5: A Criminologist’s Case Against Gun Control

    This article includes an interview with James Jacobs, director of the Center for Research in Crime and Justice at New York University School of Law. He is also a professor of constitutional law and the author of Can Gun Control Work?

    In this article, Jacobs examines misunderstandings about gun control and examines the effectiveness of various gun control strategies.

    APA Citation

    Davidson, J. (2015, December 1). A criminologist’s case against gun control. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/4100408/a-criminologists-case-against-gun-control

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    Davidson, Jacob. “‘A Criminologist’s Case Against Gun Control.” Time.com. Time Inc., 1 Dec. 2015. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    Davidson, Jacob. “‘A Criminologist’s Case Against Gun Control.” Time, 1 Dec. 2015, time.com/4100408/a-criminologists-case-against-gun-control. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    Anti-gun control article #6: How Gun Control Kills

    The author gives examples of incidents of gun violence that were stopped by people carrying guns, arguing that had such people not been on the scene, the results would have been worse.

    Hunter is an aide to conservative senator Rand Paul.

    APA Citation

    Hunter, J. (2012, December 27). How gun control kills. The American Conservative. Retrieved from http://www.theamericanconservative.com/ articles/how-gun-control-kills

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    Hunter, Jack. “How Gun Control Kills.” The American Conservative. Burr Media Group, 27 Dec. 2012. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    Hunter, Jack. “How Gun Control Kills.” The American Conservative, Burr Media Group, 27 Dec. 2012, www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/how-gun-control-kills. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    2 Resources About the Gun Control Debate

    If you’re looking for articles with more background on the subject, check out these two resources that provide an overview of gun control and a variety of discussions about the topic.

    Resource #1: Guns in America

    In 2015–2016, the well-respected news source CNN aired a series of programming titled Guns in America. This resource contains both articles and videos about a wide array of gun-related topics, including town-hall meetings, an interview with President Obama, gun violence statistics, interviews with the NRA, a discussion of the gun industry, and segments about guns and police.

    The articles and videos are too numerous to cite in this post, but I’ve included one sample to help illustrate how you might cite these resources.

    APA Citation

    Simon, M., & Sanchez, R. (2015, December 4). U.S. gun violence: The story in charts and graphs. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/ 04/us/gun-violence-graphics/index.html

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    Simon, Mallory and Ray Sanchez. “U.S. Gun Violence: The Story in Charts and Graphs.” CNN.com. Cable News Network,4 Dec. 2015. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    Simon, Mallory and Ray Sanchez. “U.S. Gun Violence: The Story in Charts and Graphs.” CNN, 4 Dec. 2015, cnn.com/2015/12/04/us/gun-violence-graphics/index.html. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    Resource #2: Gun Control Explained

    This article, published by the The New York Times, provides broad definitions of gun control, includes arguments both for and against gun control, and even speculates as to why it’s so difficult to solve the debate.

    APA Citation

    Perez-Pena, R. (2015, October 7). Gun control explained. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/ 07/us/gun-control-explained.html?_r=0

    7th Edition MLA Citation

    Perez-Pena, Richard. “Gun Control Explained.” NYTimes.com. The New York Times Company,7 Oct. 2015. Web. 10 July 2016.

    8th Edition MLA Citation

    Perez-Pena, Richard. “Gun Control Explained.” The New York Times, 7 Oct. 2015, nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/07/us/gun-control-explained.html?_r=0. Accessed 10 July 2016.

    Putting it All Together

    You can cite these or any of thousands of other gun control articles to buttress your argument. (Read 5 Best Resources to Help With Writing a Research Paper if you need assistance researching more scholarly sources.)

    Whichever side of the issue you take, make sure to mention the source, cite it properly (in-text and in your Works Cited or References list), and format direct quotations, summaries, and paraphrases per MLA 7th edition, MLA 8th edition, or APA guidelines.

    If you copy the APA or MLA citations I created above, be sure to update the accessed date (10 July 2016) to the date that you accessed the article.

    Keep in mind that there will be very, very few sources (including the ones I used above) that are totally objective. Most writers—and most websites—will be catering to an audience. For a fuller list of issues on both sides of the debate, check out these Top Pro & Con Arguments on gun control.

    Your job is to filter out the bias and see what value a given person’s argument really has. Some of the most rabid commentators on both sides of the issue actually make good points—you just have to get past all the screaming.

    Once you’re ready to start writing, check out these sample essays on gun control for some ideas on how to put your paper together.

    If you need help with writing your essay, read How to Write a Research Paper: a Step-by-Step Guide. Need help with overall formatting according to the style guide you’re using? Give these resources a try:

    When you’re finished drafting your argument, don’t forget to have an editor proofread your essay for you.

    Good luck!

    Psst... 98% of Kibin users report better grades! Get inspiration from over 500,000 example essays.

    One thought on “Gun Control Should Be Banned Essay

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *